HR On the Record · September poll results
We asked HR leaders what would most improve the business value of their recognition program in 2027. Four answers finished within five points of each other.
The results
When one answer runs away with a poll, the field agrees on the bottleneck. When four answers land this close, people are looking at the same problem from different places.
Small, self-selected sample of HR On the Record newsletter readers, September 2026.
"As you plan for 2027, what would most improve the business value of your recognition program?"
Group the answers and two camps appear. We think they're describing the same situation from different seats. The evidence camp has been building since July, when 48% of you named scattered recognition as your top priority.
The inconsistency is the data
Illustration only. Dot sizes are not survey or client data.
Why managers are the variable
of the variance in engagement scores across business units comes down to the manager.
Gallup [1]of people say their most memorable recognition came from their manager, the top source.
Gallup [2]Employees who don't feel adequately recognized are twice as likely to say they'll quit within a year.
Gallup [2]of managers worldwide were engaged in 2025, down from 31% in 2022. They give recognition all day; almost nobody gives it to them.
Gallup, State of the Global Workplace 2026 [3]What we're seeing this fall
Our weekly scan of HR trade press keeps turning up the same themes: fewer managers carrying more people, and recognition treated as a resourcing problem. The spread between your best and worst recognizers is likely to get wider, not narrower.
Newly named in the trade press
The great flattening
Organizations shrinking the management layer without preparing the managers who remain.
HR Executive, August 2026 [5]"manager recognition"
New in our own search data: HR teams have started finding Inspirus by searching for help with the exact problem this poll surfaced.
Where Inspirus comes down
We sell recognition software, so weigh this with that in mind. Each poll answer is a step, and the order matters.
Join manager and peer recognition activity to turnover and engagement at the manager level. A one-time export is enough to start.
Better-connected data and toolsCompare your most and least active recognizers. Price it with finance's own cost-per-departure number, or plug your numbers into our turnover cost calculator.
Clearer proof of ROISpend enablement money on specific, personal recognition. More reminders won't do it.
Manager participation + personalized recognitionThe same comparison, six months later. That's your ROI story, built from your own people.
Clearer proof of ROIThe poll didn't split because HR leaders disagree. It split because each of you is standing at a different step.
Estimate what employee turnover costs your organization, so the gap between your best and worst recognizers has a dollar figure.
Calculate your cost → Free tool · Budget seasonPlan where your 2027 recognition dollars go, so the budget follows the sequence instead of being split four ways.
Plan your budget →Before you take it to your CFO
Managers who recognize well are often better managers in other ways, and their people might stay regardless. Say so up front. It's still a far stronger case than a company-wide average, and it tells you exactly where enablement money should go first.
Keep reading
Planning for 2027?
Talk with our team about connecting recognition to the retention and engagement numbers your CFO already trusts, and about giving your managers the support to close the gap.