<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=564901527947923&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

HR On the Record · September poll results

Your uneven managers are the ROI study you haven't run

We asked HR leaders what would most improve the business value of their recognition program in 2027. Four answers finished within five points of each other.

The results

Nobody won

When one answer runs away with a poll, the field agrees on the bottleneck. When four answers land this close, people are looking at the same problem from different places.

Small, self-selected sample of HR On the Record newsletter readers, September 2026.

"As you plan for 2027, what would most improve the business value of your recognition program?"

More consistent manager participation27.5%
More meaningful, personalized recognition27.5%
Clearer proof of ROI22.5%
Better-connected data and tools22.5%
55%A behavior problem
45%An evidence problem

Group the answers and two camps appear. We think they're describing the same situation from different seats. The evidence camp has been building since July, when 48% of you named scattered recognition as your top priority.

The inconsistency is the data

The average hides the story. The spread tells it.

Illustration: each dot is a manager, sized by how much recognition they give per direct report. Blended together they average out to one line. Sorted into quartiles, the gap between the most and least active managers becomes visible. Company average Most activeQuartile 2Quartile 3Least active Compare turnover + engagementCompare turnover + engagement
Same program. Different managers. Sort managers by recognition given per direct report, then line each quartile up against its teams' voluntary turnover and engagement scores. A few exports and an afternoon.

Illustration only. Dot sizes are not survey or client data.

Why managers are the variable

The program is identical from team to team. The manager isn't.

70%

of the variance in engagement scores across business units comes down to the manager.

Gallup [1]
28%

of people say their most memorable recognition came from their manager, the top source.

Gallup [2]
2x

Employees who don't feel adequately recognized are twice as likely to say they'll quit within a year.

Gallup [2]
22%

of managers worldwide were engaged in 2025, down from 31% in 2022. They give recognition all day; almost nobody gives it to them.

Gallup, State of the Global Workplace 2026 [3]

What we're seeing this fall

The pressure on managers now has a name

Our weekly scan of HR trade press keeps turning up the same themes: fewer managers carrying more people, and recognition treated as a resourcing problem. The spread between your best and worst recognizers is likely to get wider, not narrower.

Newly named in the trade press

The great flattening

Organizations shrinking the management layer without preparing the managers who remain.

HR Executive, August 2026 [5]

Recognition matters. Running it is the problem.

of U.S. hiring managers say recognizing employees is important99%
say they don't have the resources to manage it well45%
The Harris Poll for Express Employment Professionals, 1,000 U.S. hiring decision-makers, June 2025 [6]

Where Inspirus comes down

Sequence the 2027 budget. Don't split it four ways.

We sell recognition software, so weigh this with that in mind. Each poll answer is a step, and the order matters.

  1. STEP 1

    Connect the data

    Join manager and peer recognition activity to turnover and engagement at the manager level. A one-time export is enough to start.

    Better-connected data and tools
  2. STEP 2

    Put a cost on the gap

    Compare your most and least active recognizers. Price it with finance's own cost-per-departure number, or plug your numbers into our turnover cost calculator.

    Clearer proof of ROI
  3. STEP 3

    Coach the bottom quartile

    Spend enablement money on specific, personal recognition. More reminders won't do it.

    Manager participation + personalized recognition
  4. STEP 4

    Rerun in six months

    The same comparison, six months later. That's your ROI story, built from your own people.

    Clearer proof of ROI
Four answers, one sequence.

The poll didn't split because HR leaders disagree. It split because each of you is standing at a different step.

Before you take it to your CFO

Say the quiet part first

A manager-level comparison shows correlation.

Managers who recognize well are often better managers in other ways, and their people might stay regardless. Say so up front. It's still a far stronger case than a company-wide average, and it tells you exactly where enablement money should go first.

Planning for 2027?

Find out what your managers' recognition is worth

Talk with our team about connecting recognition to the retention and engagement numbers your CFO already trusts, and about giving your managers the support to close the gap.